Club for Growth argues free speech against John Doe

The John Doe investigation is a proceeding that one might argue should be allowed to take its course within the institutions of state government, especially since there is a state statute to be interpreted and applied. Why should O’Keefe and the Club be allowed to go on the offensive in federal court? Isn’t that disruptive, duplicative, and disrespectful? The brief must answer those questions.

Via “In short, Defendants claim a carte blanche to target more or less every person or group that has ever participated in Wisconsin political or policy debates…” @ Althouse

Comments are closed.